The One Who Walks After Death

The Old Norse word is draugr. The plural is draugar. The sagas do not translate it. The English translators, working in the late nineteenth century, render it variously as the dead-walker, the again-walker, the barrow-dweller, or simply the ghost. None of the renderings carry the whole of the word. The word means, more precisely, one who has died and has not finished.

The sagas record him often.

He is recorded in Eyrbyggja, in the Froda hauntings, where Thorgunna of the Hebrides dies on the way to her burial and the company that carried the body cannot keep the household clean of her, and where, after her death, six others die one after the next and walk in the household until the door-doom is summoned. He is recorded in Grettis Saga, where the shepherd Glamr refuses the Yule fast, dies in the snow, and rises, and where Grettir the strong meets him in the steading and is changed by what is said in the meeting. He is recorded in Laxdaela, where Hrapp of the Hebrides arranges before his death to be buried standing in the doorway of his hall, the better, he says, to keep watch over his household, and the records show what the watch becomes.

He is not, in the sagas, a translucent figure. The sagas are clear on this. He is solid. He is heavy. He is colder than the living and stronger than the living, and the strength is recorded as having grown since the burial.

On his appearance

The recorded descriptions converge.

He is the colour the body becomes after the burial has had time. The sagas use words that the translators render as blue-black, as hel-blue, as corpse-pale. The eyes are not always given. Where they are given, they are recorded as open. The hair, the records say, has continued to grow. The fingernails, the records say, have continued to grow. He is dressed in the clothes he was buried in, where the burial was performed, and in the clothes he died in where it was not.

His weight is the detail the sagas return to. He has, the sagas say, the weight of a man and the weight again of the earth that lies above him. To wrestle him, as Grettir wrestled Glamr, is to wrestle a man who carries his burial mound on his shoulders. Glamr is described in Grettis Saga as so heavy that the boards of the hall buckled where he walked.

He does not appear far from where he was buried. This is the second consistent detail. The barrow-dweller stays near the barrow. The household-walker stays near the household. He has been buried in a place. The place holds him. The place does not, the records show, hold him as well as the burial intended.

On the door-doom

The counter-rite is recorded in several forms across the sagas. The most fully preserved is the duradomr, the door-doom, which is described in Eyrbyggja in the closing chapters of the Froda hauntings.

The door-doom is a court. The court is convened in the doorway of the haunted household, in daylight, with witnesses, and the proceedings are conducted exactly as a court of the living would be conducted. The dead are summoned by name. The charge is read against them. They are accused of the offence of remaining where they no longer have a place. The witnesses are heard. The verdict is given. The dead, having been judged and named, are required by the verdict to leave.

In the Eyrbyggja account they leave. They speak as they go. Each, according to the saga, names a small grievance with the household before crossing the threshold. They do not return.

The marginalia preserved alongside the saga record additional measures. An iron nail was driven through the soles of the feet of the body before burial. The body was carried out of the household not through the door but through a hole made in the wall, which was then filled in, so that the path back could not be retraced. The body was laid face down. The body was reburied at a distance, in unworked land, with stones laid across it.

It is recorded that where the door-doom was kept, the dead in those households did not walk again. It is recorded, in the same passages, that the door-doom was not always available. There were households in which the rite had been forgotten, or in which there were no witnesses of standing, or in which the household itself was the cause of the haunting. In those households, the sagas note, the dead were permitted to remain. The records do not say what became of the living who lived alongside them.